CFPs: Boosting Fact-Checking Activities in Europe

The present Call for Proposals establishes specific provisions regulating the process of applying for funding of actions in support of fact-checking. It aims at complementing the activities of the European Digital Media Observatory (hereafter EDMO) by providing funding to fact-checking projects that contribute to increase coverage and timeliness of fact-checks, as well as strengthen fact-checking organisations in Europe.

Objectives

• Independent fact-checking organisations play a key role in limiting the negative effects of disinformation on the public discourse and democratic processes. In addition to raising public awareness about concrete disinformation cases, their work feeds into mainstream news, media literacy practices and research, thereby entailing a strong multiplier effect.

Priorities

• This Call aims at strengthening the European fact-checking ecosystem by focusing on two priority actions:
  • Urgent actions: projects designed to increase coverage, depth, and speed of factchecking activities by organisations that commit to producing regular flows of fact-checks:
    • in connection to critical events (e.g., elections, public health or public security crises, etc.), which may be likely targets of disinformation campaigns in one or more European countries; and/or
    • aimed at improving the detection and understanding of disinformation narratives in topical areas of public interest (e.g., climate change, economic recovery, immigration, geopolitical issues, EU policies, etc.) within relevant information environments (local/national/European).
  • Scale-up projects: free-lance collaborations within newsrooms and/or the integration of state-of-the-art technologies for content verification and media and social media monitoring. This Call encourages projects:
    • involving structured and time-framed, free-lance collaborations with specialist staff (journalists, but also subject-matter experts or data analysts) to enhance diversity and bring complementary skills and innovative approaches in fact checking organisations, as well as best factchecking practices in newsrooms, thereby paving the way for more stable job opportunities and expanding journalistic coverage around topics of public interest that may be actual or potential targets of disinformation campaigns; and/or
    • Involving the licensing or acquisition of adequate online content verification technologies and network analysis tools, which are instrumental for scaling-up and improving the efficiency of debunking activities, notably in view of the increasingly sophisticated information manipulation tactics and techniques employed in disinformation campaigns.

Funding Information

• Urgent Actions: € 55,000.00
  • Duration: 6
• Scale-up projects: € 80,000.00
  • Duration: 12

Expectations

• The projects funded under this Call are expected to:
  • raise public awareness and empower diverse readerships in different European countries to critically assess news and information accessed through different media, notably online;
  • foster knowledge-sharing between fact-checking organisations, civil society, researchers, media outlets and online platforms;
  • facilitate the creation of a European network of independent fact-checking organisations;
  • stimulate innovation in fact-checking organisations, newsrooms and improvement of journalistic skills;
  • help reduce the impact in Europe of disinformation campaigns, including foreign interference and influence operations carried out outside Europe.

Eligible Activities

• Activities may be developed at local, regional, national, or international levels across the territory of the EU, EFTA and UK.
• Proposals should cover one of the two priorities set out in Section 1 at point a) “Urgent Actions” and point b) “Scale-up Projects”.
• The following types of activities are eligible for both priorities a) and b):
  • journalistic investigations and fact-checking activities;
  • production of original content in the form of articles (fact-checks);
  • awareness and dissemination actions, including conferences, seminars, events;
  • actions aiming at the creation and improvement of networks, exchanges of good practices, and uptake of innovative methodologies and relevant technologies.
• Additionally, for priority b), the following types of activities are also eligible:
  • integration of complementary skills via additional human resources in newsrooms;
  • usage of innovative tools improving the efficiency of fact-checking (e.g., by facilitating online content verification or network analysis).
• Eligible activities shall be those that will be developed in addition to the applicant’s current activities and that will enable a prompt detection and exposure of emerging disinformation campaigns with potential negative impact on public opinion in the relevant linguistic area(s).

Eligibility Criteria

• Applicants shall be legal entities employing fact-checkers and abiding by recognised ethical and professional standards (e.g., Code of Principles of the International Fact-Checking Network, deontological Codes for the Journalistic Profession applicable in their country of establishment, European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity).
• Should an applicant not be a signatory to any code, it should explain how it ensures de fac to adherence to the ethical and professional standards applicable to the type of activities carried out by its organisation.
• Proposals from individual entities are eligible if submitted by:
  • Small-sized independent fact-checking and news media organisations with up to 50 employees, and up to € 10 million turnover or € 10 million total balance sheet;
  • Non-governmental Organisations;
  • Universities;
  • Research centres;
  • Educational institutions;
  • Non-profit organisations.

Ineligible

• Applicants which are in one of the following exclusion situations cannot participate:
  • bankruptcy, insolvency or winding-up procedures, affairs or assets administered by a court or a liquidator, arrangement with creditors, suspended business activities or other similar procedures;
  • in breach of social security or tax obligations, established by a final judgement or a final administrative decision;
  • guilty of grave professional misconduct (including if done by persons having powers of representation, decision-making or control, beneficial owners or persons who are essential for the award/implementation of the grant), established by a final judgement or a final administrative decision;
  • committed fraud, corruption, links to a criminal organisation, money laundering, terrorism-related crimes (including terrorism financing), child labour or human trafficking (including if done by persons having powers of representation, decision-making or control, beneficial owners or persons who are essential for the award/implementation of the grant), established by a final judgment or a final administrative decision;
  • shown significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations in the performance of a procurement contract, a grant agreement, or a grant decision, which has led to its early termination or to the application of liquidated damages or other contractual penalties, (including if done by persons having powers of representation, decision-making or control, beneficial owners or persons who are essential for the award/implementation of the grant).

For more information, visit EMIF.